Attenuated vaccines for non-segmented negative sense rna viruses

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to an attenuated non-segmented negative-sense RNA virus characterized by at least one mutation in the L gene wherein the mutation reduces viral replication, the methods of manufacturing and methods of use.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

The invention was supported, in whole or in part, by a grant A1059371 from the National Institutes of Health/NIAID. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), the prototypic Rhabdovirus, has a non-segmented negative-sense (ns NS or NNS) RNA genome of 11,161 nucleotides comprising a 50-nucleotide 3′ leader region (Le); five genes that encode the viral nucleocapsid (N) protein, phosphoprotein (P), matrix (M) protein, attachment glycoprotein (G) and large polymerase subunit (L), and a 59-nucleotide trailer region (Tr), arranged in the order 3′-Le-N-P-M-G-L-Tr 5′ (1, 3, 4). The viral genomic RNA is encapsidated by N protein to form a ribonuclease-resistant ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex that acts as template for the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). The viral components of the RdRP are a monomer of the 241-kDa L protein and a trimer of the 29-kDa P protein (19). During RNA synthesis, the RdRP uses the encapsidated genomic RNA as template in two distinct reactions: (i) transcription of five messenger RNAs that encode the N, P, M, G and L proteins; and (ii) replication to yield full length antigenomic and then genomic strands (reviewed in ref. 66).

During transcription the RdRP sequentially synthesizes five capped and polyadenylated mRNAs (1, 3, 4). These mRNAs are not produced in equimolar amounts; rather, their abundance decreases with distance from the 3′ end of the template such that N>P>M>G>L (63). This polarity gradient reflects a localized transcriptional attenuation at each gene junction, where 30% of RdRP molecules fail to transcribe the downstream gene (34). The widely accepted model for mRNA synthesis is the stop-start model of sequential transcription. In the original version of this model, polymerase initiates at a single site on the genome yielding a leader RNA and, by sequential reinitiation, the 5 viral mRNA's. Access of polymerase to downstream genes is, therefore, entirely dependent upon termination of transcription of the upstream gene (hence stop-start). Recent experiments with VSV indicate that the polymerase molecule that transcribes the leader region does not proceed to transcribe the N mRNA (12, 46, 67). Other than this refinement, the stop-start model is well supported by much experimental evidence (reviewed in 66).

The cap structure of ns NS viral mRNAs is formed by a mechanism that appears unique. For VSV (2), respiratory syncytial virus (7) and spring viremia of carp virus (26), the two italicized phosphates of the 5′Gppp5′NpNpN triphosphate bridge have been shown to be derived from a GDP donor. By contrast, cellular and all other known viral capping reactions involve GMP transfer (reviewed in 24). This difference, combined with the cytoplasmic location of viral RNA synthesis suggested that a viral protein, possibly the L protein subunit of polymerase, possesses guanylyltransferase activity, though direct evidence for this is lacking. Following capping, the 5′ terminus of the nascent transcript is methylated by [guanine-N-7] and [ribose-2′-O] methyltransferases (30, 35, 40, 41, 48-50, 62). These activities have been mapped to the L gene (30). Recent work has shown that alteration of amino acid residue D1671 which resides within a predicted s-adenosyl methionine (SAM) binding region of L protein inhibited mRNA cap methylation (25). However, the catalytic residues within the polymerase, the substrate requirements for the reactions and the order in which the mRNA processing reactions occur, remain poorly understood.

The nucleotide sequence of 39 ns NS RNA virus genomes have been determined (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/VIRUSES/viruses.html). Amino acid sequence alignments between the L proteins of representative members of each family identified 6 conserved domains numbered I-VI (45). X-ray crystal structures of representative members of each class of template-dependent polynucleotide polymerase have been determined. Each contains a catalytic core resembling a cupped right hand. Within the palm region are motifs A-B-C-D found in all polymerases and motif E, found in RdRPs and reverse transcriptase. Domain III of the ns NS virus L proteins contains these A-B-C-D motifs. Consistent with this, domain III of VSV L was shown to be critical for polymerase activity (58). Functions have yet to be assigned to the other conserved domains, although sequence comparisons to FtsJ/RrmJ (FIGS. 1A & 1B), a heat shock methyltransferase of Escherichia coli, suggest that a region spanning domain VI might function as a [ribose-2′-O]-methyltransferase (9, 22).

A comprehensive genetic and biochemical analysis of the conserved domains of the VSV L protein has not been performed. However, studies with the paramyxovirus, Sendai (SeV), showed that genetic alterations introduced throughout each of the conserved domains of L protein revealed multiple defects in a reconstituted RNA synthesis assay (11, 20, 21, 32, 59, 60). These studies did not permit the assignment of specific functions to conserved domains of L protein. Rather, these experiments indicated that the global architecture of the SeV L protein was essential for all polymerase functions. More recently, domains V and VI of the SeV L protein were expressed independently and shown to retain the ability to methylate short RNA's that correspond to the 5′ end of SeV mRNA (43). The ability to functionally separate a domain of the SeV L is consistent with studies of measles virus (MV), in which the coding sequence of green fluorescent protein was inserted at two positions within L protein (17). The resulting polymerase was functional, suggesting that the MV L protein folds and functions as a series of independent globular domains (17).

The NNS RNA viruses include some of the most significant human, animal and plant pathogens extant. For many of these viruses there are no vaccines or efficacious antiviral drugs. The development of effective vaccines against such viruses is an ongoing need.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

We have mapped a function to a specific region of the viral polymerase in mRNA cap methylation and developed robust assays to study in detail these RNA processing reactions. Using these assays we have identified specific amino acid residues within the polymerase that are essential for this activity. We have demonstrated that substitution of these amino acids (which are conserved among the NNS (or ns NS) RNA viruses) attenuates the replication of the virus 1-3 logs in cell culture demonstrating the potential of this approach for the rational attenuation of live virus vaccines for non-segmented negative-sense RNA viruses. These viruses include viruses of the order Mononegavirales, such as members of the families Rhabdoviridae, Filoviridae and Paramyxoviridae. Paramyxoviruses include but are not limited to Avulavirus (e.g. Newcastle disease virus), Henipavirus (e.g., Hendravirus and Nipah virus), Morbillivirus (e.g., measles, rinderpest, and canine distemper); Respirovirus (e.g., Sendai, human parainfluenza viruses 1 and 3, bovine parainfluenza virus); Rubulavirus (e.g., mumps, simian parainfluenza virus 5, human parainfluenza virus 2, and menangle virus); Pneumoviridae (e.g., human respiratory syncytial virus, pneumoniavirus of mice and bovine respiratory syncytial virus); subfamily Metapneumovirus (e.g., avian pneumovirus and human metapneumovirus). Rhabdoviridae, include but are not limited to Cytorhabdovirus (e.g., Lettuce necrotic yellows virus); Ephemerovirus (e.g., Bovine ephemeral fever virus); Lvssavirus (e.g., rabies, mokola and Australian bat lyssavirus); Novirhabdovirus (e.g., infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus and viral hemorrhagic septicemia); Nucleorhabdovirus (e.g., sonchus yellow net virus and potato yellow dwarf virus); Vesiculovirus (e.g. Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus, Vesicular stomatitis New Jersey virus and spring viremia of carp). Filoviruses include but are not limited to Marburg virus and Ebola virus.

Thus, the invention relates to attenuated NNS RNA viruses, such as those discussed above. The viruses of the invention can be useful as vaccines that protect or treat viral infections by such NNS-RNA viruses. Thus, the invention relates to the use of the viruses of the invention to treat or prevent viral infections in animals, including humans, in need or at risk thereof. Furthermore, the invention relates to compositions and methods of using attenuated viruses to deliver genetic material to plant tissue or plants, such as crops.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated and supported in the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1A is an amino acid sequence alignment of a region encompassing domain VI of ns NS RNA virus L proteins with the RrmJ heat shock 2′-O-methyltransferase of Escherichia coli.

FIG. 1B is the alignment of FIG. 1A designating the polypeptides presented with sequence identifiers (i.e., SEQ ID NOs).

FIG. 2A illustrates plaques of recombinant VSV with mutations in the L gene.

FIG. 2B is the illustration of FIG. 2A designating the polypeptides and polynucleotides presented with sequence identifiers (i.e., SEQ ID NOs).

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating single-step growth assay of recombinant VSV in BHK-21 cells.

FIG. 4A show the results of transcription reactions performed in vitro in the presence of [α-³²P]-GTP.

FIG. 4B presents the results of three independent experiments used to generate the quantitative analysis shown.

FIG. 5A show the effect of L gene mutations on cap methyltransferase activity.

FIG. 5B provides a quantitative analysis of five independent experiments.

FIG. 6A shows the effect of L gene mutations on [ribose-2′-O] methylation.

FIG. 6B provides a quantitative analysis of three independent experiments.

FIG. 7A shows the effect of L gene mutations on viral RNA synthesis in BHK-21 cells.

FIG. 7B provides autoradiographs of five independent experiments scanned and analyzed as described in methods.

FIG. 8A shows the effect of L gene mutations on viral protein synthesis in BHK-21 cells.

FIG. 8B provides the quantitative analysis of three independent experiments.

FIG. 9 illustrates a VSV domain VI surface model.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.

During mRNA synthesis, the polymerase of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) copies the genomic RNA to produce five capped and polyadenylated mRNAs with the 5′ terminal structure 7^(m)GpppA^(m)pApCpApNpNpApUpCp (SEQ ID NO.:73). The 5′ mRNA processing events are poorly understood, but presumably require triphosphatase, guanylyltransferase, [guanine-N-7] and [ribose-2′-O] methyltransferase (MTase) activities. Consistent with a role in mRNA methylation, conserved domain VI of the 241 kDa large (L) polymerase protein shares sequence homology with a bacterial [ribose-2′-O]-MTase, FtsJ/RrmJ. We generated multiple L gene mutations to test this hypothesis. Individual substitutions to the predicted MTase active-site residues K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833 yielded viruses with pinpoint plaque morphologies and 10-1000 fold replication defects in single-step growth assays. Consistent with these defects, viral RNA and protein synthesis was diminished. By contrast, alteration of residue G1674 predicted to bind the methyl donor S-adenosyl methionine (SAM), did not significantly perturb viral growth and gene expression. However, subsequent experiments show that other alterations in this domain resulted in attenuation. Analysis of the mRNA cap-structure revealed that alterations to the predicted active site residues decreased [guanine-N-7] and [ribose-2′-O] MTase activity below the limit of detection of our assay. These data show that the predicted MTase active site residues K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833 within domain VI of the VSV L protein are essential for mRNA cap methylation.

Thus, in one aspect, the invention relates to an attenuated non-segmented negative-sense RNA virus (ns NS RNA virus) characterized by at least one mutation in the L gene wherein the mutation reduces viral replication, the generation of such viruses and their use. To be clear, the word “mutation” is not intended to infer the introduction of a nucleotide change by any particular mechanism. Thus, the term is meant to include the change, modification or alteration of a native sequence by any means or method. The mutation preferably results in an amino acid modification to the region of L protein designated conserved Domain VI. The modification can be of a conserved or non-conserved amino acid. An amino acid is “conserved” if the amino acid is found in at least three, preferably five, different (distinct), wild-type, non-segmented negative-sense RNA viruses. For example, an amino acid which is found in a amino acid sequence alignment according, such as the sequence alignment described above, of the L protein from at least three (or five) distinct strains of paramyxovirus, measles, mumps, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, human metapneumovirus, Nipah virus, rhabdoviruses, rabies virus and Bovine Ephemeral Fever virus, filovirus, Ebola virus and Marburg virus. For example, we have found that amino acid substitutions in K1651, G1670, D1671, G1672, S1673, G1675, D1735, D1762, K1795, and E1833 of vesicular stomatitis virus resulted in good to excellent virus attenuation. Thus, amino acid modifications at these as well as other adjacent and proximal amino acids of VSV and to the equivalent residues of its ns NS RNA virus homologs are expected to result in attenuation. To be clear, modifications can also include amino acid substitutions, insertions or deletions at, proximal to, upstream or downstream of such amino acids.

Viruses which are useful to produce attenuated non-segmented negative-sense RNA virus (ns NS RNA virus) of the invention include, but are not limited to, the virused detailed herein. For example, Mononegavirales, such as members of the families Rhabdoviridae, Filoviridae and Paramyxoviridae. Paramyxoviruses include but are not limited to Avulavirus (e.g. Newcastle disease virus), Henipavirus (e.g., Hendravirus and Nipah virus), Morbillivirus (e.g., measles, rinderpest, and canine distemper); Respirovirus (e.g., Sendai, human parainfluenza viruses 1 and 3, bovine parainfluenza virus); Rubulavirus (e.g., mumps, simian parainfluenza virus 5, human parainfluenza virus 2, and menangle virus); Pneumoviridae (e.g., human respiratory syncytial virus, pneumoniavirus of mice and bovine respiratory syncytial virus); subfamily Metapneumovirus (e.g., avian pneumovirus and human metapneumovirus). Rhabdoviridae, include but are not limited to Cytorhabdovirus (e.g., Lettuce necrotic yellows virus); Ephemerovirus (e.g., Bovine ephemeral fever virus); Lyssavirus (e.g., rabies, mokola and Australian bat lyssavirus); Novirhabdovirus (e.g., infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus and viral hemorrhagic septicemia); Nucleorhabdovirus (e.g., sonchus yellow net virus and potato yellow dwarf virus); Vesiculovirus (e.g. Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus, Vesicular stomatitis New Jersey virus and spring viremia of carp). Filoviruses include but are not limited to Marburg virus and Ebola virus.

Preferably, more than one mutation in the gene is made, resulting in a protein with a modification in one, two, three, four or more amino acids. For example, two or more nucleotides within a single codon can be changed. Such modifications can result in a reduced ability to revert to a wild-type or fully competent sequence. Similarly, mutations which result in modification of multiple amino acids can also result in a reduced ability to revert to a wild-type or fully competent sequence. The modifications can be independently selected to result in an amino acid substitution with another amino acid (such as with a conserved or non-conserved amino acid) or deleted. Further the modifications may each be selected within Domain VI of the L protein, within other Domains or within other viral proteins. For example, an attenuated VSV characterized by an L protein with substitutions at each of G1670, G1672, G1674 and G1675 resulted in good attenuation. In another embodiment, an attenuated VSV characterized by an L protein with substitutions at each of G1674, G1675 and D1733 resulted in good attenuation. Similarly, making modifications (e.g., substitutions) at equivalent residues of its ns NS RNA virus homologs can be expected to result in attenuation. Substitutions, insertions and deletions at the nucleotide sequence level can result not only in substitutions of single or multiple amino acids, but also in increased or decreased overall number of amino acids encoded by the mutated nucleotide sequence relative to the unmutated sequence.

In another embodiment, at least one mutation alters an amino acid located in the protein surface defined by K1651, D1762, K1795, and E1833, referencing VSV, as predicted by protein modeling. FIG. 9 depicts such a modeling. In yet another embodiment, the crystal structure of the protein can be determined according to known methods. Thus, at least one modification (or alterations, used interchangeably herein) is to an amino acid located in the protein surface defined by K1651, D1762, K1795, and E1833 as determined by crystallography.

A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the so-called “K1651 residue”, for example, of the L protein of an ns NS RNA virus other than VSV will not necessarily be at the residue numbered 1651. Rather the “K1651 residue” (and similarly each and every conserved amino acid referred to herein) corresponds to the conserved amino acid which aligns with K1651 of the VSV L protein, employing art recognized alignment techniques. An example of such a technique is found in FIG. 1. Likewise, non-conserved amino acids of the VSV L protein are referenced herein. Such non-conserved amino acids of the L protein of an ns NS RNA virus other than VSV will likewise not necessarily be at the residue sharing the same number as VSV. Rather such a residue corresponds to the amino acid which aligns with the VSV amino acid, employing the conserved amino acids as a base reference and employing art recognized alignment techniques, such as that found in FIG. 1.

Generally, the mutations/modifications result in reduction of mRNA cap methylation activity. Activity reduction can be determined by employing the assay described in the following examples, comparing the original wild type strain used in producing the virus or the wild type virus described herein with the mutated virus. Reduction of at least 30%, such as at least 40%, or at least 50%, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, or at least 80%, or at least 90% or more is desirable.

Where the attenuated virus is to be used as a vaccine, it is further preferred that the virus of the invention substantially retains its ability to express antigenic viral proteins, such as N, P, M and/or G protein. Retention can be determined, again, by employing the assay described in the following examples, comparing the original wild type strain used in producing the virus or the wild type virus described herein with the mutated virus. Retention of at least 30%, such as at least 40%, or at least 50% or at least 60% or more is desirable.

In one embodiment, the invention can be used as a vaccine vector or to manipulate a vector based on ns NS RNA viruses to deliver heterologous genes. Where the attenuated virus is to be used as a vector, it is further preferred that the virus of the invention retains its ability to infect and express the heterologous sequence contained therein. In this embodiment, retention of native viral protein expression is not necessarily critical.

Thus, the invention includes a virus comprising a heterologous gene linked to an essential effecting sequence for the transcription. The heterologous gene can encode a viral antigen, such as an ns-NS RNA viral antigen or other antigen, such as those obtained from other viruses, bacteria, fungi or parasites. A useful antigen also might be a mammalian protein useful, for example, in a cancer vaccine. For example, the pathogens can include HIV, HTLV, mycobacteria, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and hepatitis B virus. Subunit vaccines are generally known in the art for a variety of pathogens. The heterologous protein can also be a tumor cell antigen. In yet another embodiment, the gene can encode a therapeutic protein. For example, a gene that encodes a protein which has an adjuvant or immunomodulatory effect can be used. Alternatively, the gene can encode an oncolytic protein or other therapeutic protein. Alternatively expression of a non-coding RNA can be envisaged, such as ribozymes, micro RNAs, siRNA and other therapeutic RNAs.

In this embodiment, a gene or polynucleic acid molecule (or transgene) encoding the protein can be inserted into the genome of the virus mutant under the control of a regulatory element which, upon infection, will result in the expression of the gene or molecule. This heterologous gene can encode an amino acid sequence native to a pathogen (e.g., “an authentic protein”). Alternatively, the protein can be an immunogenic or antigenic mutant or fragment of the protein comprising one or more epitopes of the protein encoded by a heterologous gene or polynucleotide. In addition, the heterologous gene or polynucleotide product can be a fusion protein comprising a viral protein fused to an immunogenic or antigenic epitope (such as the full length sequence of the pathogenic protein). Alternatively the gene or polynucleotide can be non-coding.

The viruses of the invention can be incorporated into pharmaceutical compositions. When the compositions of this invention comprise a combination of a compound of the formulae described herein and one or more additional therapeutic or prophylactic agents, both the compound and the additional agent should be present at dosage levels of between about 1 to 100%, and more preferably between about 5 to 95% of the dosage normally administered in a monotherapy regimen. The additional agents may be administered separately, as part of a multiple dose regimen, from the compounds of this invention. Alternatively, those agents may be part of a single dosage form, mixed together with the compounds of this invention in a single composition.

As used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient” means a non-toxic, inert solid, semi-solid or liquid filler, diluent, encapsulating material or formulation auxiliary of any type. Some examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically acceptable carriers are sugars such as lactose, glucose and sucrose; starches such as corn starch and potato starch; cellulose and its derivatives such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate; powdered tragacanth; malt; gelatin; talc; excipients such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; oils such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; glycols such as propylene glycol; esters such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; agar; buffering agents such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; alginic acid; pyrogen-free water; isotonic saline; Ringer's solution; ethyl alcohol, and phosphate buffer solutions, as well as other non-toxic compatible lubricants such as sodium lauryl sulfate and magnesium stearate, as well as coloring agents, releasing agents, coating agents, sweetening, flavoring and perfuming agents, preservatives and antioxidants can also be present in the composition, according to the judgment of the formulator.

The pharmaceutical compositions of this invention may be administered orally, parenterally, by inhalation spray, transdermally (e.g., by patch or hypospray), topically, rectally, nasally, buccally, vaginally or via an implanted reservoir, preferably by oral administration or administration by injection. The pharmaceutical compositions of this invention may contain any conventional non-toxic pharmaceutically-acceptable carriers, adjuvants or vehicles. In some cases, the pH of the formulation may be adjusted with pharmaceutically acceptable acids, bases or buffers to enhance the stability of the formulated compound or its delivery form. The term parenteral as used herein includes subcutaneous, intracutaneous, intravenous, intramuscular, intraarticular, intraarterial, intrasynovial, intrasternal, intrathecal, intralesional and intracranial injection or infusion techniques. It is desired to formulate the virus to maintain its stability or infectivity.

Liquid dosage forms for oral administration include pharmaceutically acceptable emulsions, microemulsions, solutions, suspensions, syrups and elixirs. In addition to the active compounds, the liquid dosage forms may contain inert diluents commonly used in the art such as, for example, water or other solvents, solubilizing agents and emulsifiers such as ethyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, ethyl carbonate, ethyl acetate, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, propylene glycol, 1,3-butylene glycol, dimethylformamide, oils (in particular, cottonseed, groundnut, corn, germ, olive, castor, and sesame oils), glycerol, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol, polyethylene glycols and fatty acid esters of sorbitan, and mixtures thereof. Besides inert diluents, the oral compositions can also include adjuvants such as wetting agents, emulsifying and suspending agents, sweetening, flavoring, and perfuming agents.

Injectable preparations, for example, sterile injectable aqueous or oleaginous suspensions, may be formulated according to the known art using suitable dispersing or wetting agents and suspending agents. The sterile injectable preparation may also be a sterile injectable solution, suspension or emulsion in a nontoxic parenterally acceptable diluent or solvent, for example, as a solution in 1,3-butanediol. Among the acceptable vehicles and solvents that may be employed are water, Ringer's solution, U.S.P. and isotonic sodium chloride solution. In addition, sterile, fixed oils are conventionally employed as a solvent or suspending medium. For this purpose any bland fixed oil can be employed including synthetic mono- or diglycerides. In addition, fatty acids such as oleic acid are used in the preparation of injectables.

The injectable formulations can be sterilized, for example, by filtration through a bacterial-retaining filter, or by incorporating sterilizing agents in the form of sterile solid compositions which can be dissolved or dispersed in sterile water or other sterile injectable medium prior to use.

In order to prolong the effect of a drug, it is often desirable to slow the absorption of the drug from subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. This may be accomplished by the use of a liquid suspension of crystalline or amorphous material with poor water solubility. The rate of absorption of the drug then depends upon its rate of dissolution, which, in turn, may depend upon crystal size and crystalline form. Alternatively, delayed absorption of a parenterally administered drug form is accomplished by dissolving or suspending the drug in an oil vehicle. Injectable depot forms are made by forming microencapsule matrices of the drug in biodegradable polymers such as polylactide-polyglycolide. Depending upon the ratio of drug to polymer and the nature of the particular polymer employed, the rate of drug release can be controlled. Examples of other biodegradable polymers include poly(orthoesters) and poly(anhydrides). Depot injectable formulations are also prepared by entrapping the drug in liposomes or microemulsions that are compatible with body tissues.

Compositions for rectal or vaginal administration are preferably suppositories which can be prepared by mixing the compounds of this invention with suitable non-irritating excipients or carriers such as cocoa butter, polyethylene glycol or a suppository wax which are solid at ambient temperature but liquid at body temperature and therefore melt in the rectum or vaginal cavity and release the active compound.

Solid dosage forms for oral administration include capsules, tablets, pills, powders, and granules. In such solid dosage forms, the active compound is mixed with at least one inert, pharmaceutically acceptable excipient or carrier such as sodium citrate or dicalcium phosphate and/or: a) fillers or extenders such as starches, lactose, sucrose, glucose, mannitol, and silicic acid, b) binders such as, for example, carboxymethylcellulose, alginates, gelatin, polyvinylpyrrolidinone, sucrose, and acacia, c) humectants such as glycerol, d) disintegrating agents such as agar-agar, calcium carbonate, potato or tapioca starch, alginic acid, certain silicates, and sodium carbonate, e) solution retarding agents such as paraffin, f) absorption accelerators such as quaternary ammonium compounds, g) wetting agents such as, for example, cetyl alcohol and glycerol monostearate, h) absorbents such as kaolin and bentonite clay, and i) lubricants such as talc, calcium stearate, magnesium stearate, solid polyethylene glycols, sodium lauryl sulfate, and mixtures thereof. In the case of capsules, tablets and pills, the dosage form may also comprise buffering agents.

Solid compositions of a similar type may also be employed as fillers in soft and hard-filled gelatin capsules using such excipients as lactose or milk sugar as well as high molecular weight polyethylene glycols and the like.

The solid dosage forms of tablets, dragees, capsules, pills, and granules can be prepared with coatings and shells such as enteric coatings and other coatings well known in the pharmaceutical formulating art. They may optionally contain opacifying agents and can also be of a composition that they release the active ingredient(s) only, or preferentially, in a certain part of the intestinal tract, optionally, in a delayed manner. Examples of embedding compositions that can be used include polymeric substances and waxes.

Dosage forms for topical or transdermal administration of a compound of this invention include ointments, pastes, creams, lotions, gels, powders, solutions, sprays, inhalants or patches. The active component is admixed under sterile conditions with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier and any needed preservatives or buffers as may be required. Ophthalmic formulation, ear drops, eye ointments, powders and solutions are also contemplated as being within the scope of this invention.

The ointments, pastes, creams and gels may contain, in addition to an active compound of this invention, excipients such as animal and vegetable fats, oils, waxes, paraffins, starch, tragacanth, cellulose derivatives, polyethylene glycols, silicones, bentonites, silicic acid, talc and zinc oxide, or mixtures thereof.

Powders and sprays can contain, in addition to the compounds of this invention, excipients such as lactose, talc, silicic acid, aluminum hydroxide, calcium silicates and polyamide powder, or mixtures of these substances. Sprays can additionally contain customary propellants such as chlorofluorohydrocarbons.

Transdermal patches have the added advantage of providing controlled delivery of a compound to the body. Such dosage forms can be made by dissolving or dispensing the compound in the proper medium. Absorption enhancers can also be used to increase the flux of the compound across the skin. The rate can be controlled by either providing a rate controlling membrane or by dispersing the compound in a polymer matrix or gel.

According to the methods of treatment of the present invention, bacterial infections are treated or prevented in a patient such as a human or other animals by administering to the patient a therapeutically effective amount of a compound of the invention, in such amounts and for such time as is necessary to achieve the desired result.

By a “therapeutically effective amount” of a compound of the invention is meant a sufficient amount of the compound to treat or prevent the targeted infection or disease.

Thus, the invention further relates to a method of vaccinating an animal comprising administering a virus and/or pharmaceutical composition of the invention. Because VSV possesses oncolytic effects, the invention also includes a method of treating tumors comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of a virus or pharmaceutical composition of the invention. The invention also provides viruses useful in delivery of therapeutic proteins to an animal. Further, the invention includes the virus for use in medicine or for the manufacture of a medicament for vaccinating a mammal. It will be understood, however, that the total daily usage of the compounds and compositions of the present invention will be decided by the attending physician within the scope of sound medical judgment. The specific therapeutically effective dose level for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors including the disorder being treated and the severity of the disorder; the activity of the specific compound employed; the specific composition employed; the age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the patient; the time of administration, route of administration, and rate of excretion of the specific compound employed; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or contemporaneously with the specific compound employed; and like factors well known in the medical arts.

The viruses described herein can, for example, be administered by injection, intravenously, intraarterially, subdermally, intraperitoneally, intramuscularly, or subcutaneously; or orally, buccally, nasally, transmucosally, topically, in an ophthalmic preparation, or by inhalation. The methods herein contemplate administration of an effective amount of composition to achieve the desired or stated effect. Typically, the pharmaceutical compositions of this invention will be administered prophylactically.

Specific dosage and treatment regimens for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors, including the activity of the specific compound employed, the age, body weight, general health status, sex, diet, time of administration, rate of excretion, drug combination, the severity and course of the disease, condition or symptoms, the patient's disposition to the disease, condition or symptoms, and the judgment of the treating physician.

Furthermore, the viruses of the invention can be used to deliver heterologous genes to plants or plant tissues as generally known in the art. In this embodiment, the heterologous polynucleotide can deliver a protein of interest (e.g., antifreeze proteins, anti-infectives, or proteins relating to flavor, shelf-life, etc.) or a polynucleotide (e.g., siRNA).

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein are accorded the meaning commonly known to one with ordinary skill in the art. All publications, patents, published patent applications, and other references mentioned herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Materials and Methods Plasmid Construction and Transfection of Mammalian Cells

The pL plasmid containing a functional cDNA clone of the VSV L gene was described previously (56). The coding sequence was modified by site directed mutagenesis using the Quick Change methodology (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The presence of the desired mutation was confirmed by sequence analysis of a 2 kb region of pL that spanned from an Fse I site at position 9017 to an Age I site at position 11004 (numbering refers to the complete VSV (Indiana) genome sequence). Following digestion of each pL variant with these restriction enzymes, the resulting 2 kb fragment was subcloned back into pL digested with Fse I and Age I. This approach ensured that no other sequence alterations introduced during the mutagenesis reaction were present within the final L gene clone. Using this method, multiple L gene mutations were generated (FIGS. 1A & 1B). Plasmids designed to express the viral N and P proteins, and an infectious cDNA clone of the viral genome, pVSV1(+), were as described previously (65). Transfection of baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells was performed essentially as described, except that Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) was used as the lipid transfection reagent.

Recovery and Purification of Recombinant VSV

Selected L gene mutations were introduced into pVSV1(+) in two steps. First, a 2.5 kb-fragment spanning from the Fse I site at 9014 to the Hind III site at 10645 was excised from pL and inserted into Fse I, Hind III digested pVSV1(+). Second, a 0.8 kb Hind III fragment from pVSV1 (+) encoding the 5′ terminus of the L gene, the trailer region and the hepatitis delta virus ribozyme sequence was then inserted at the unique Hind III site, to generate pVSV1(+) variants designed to have single amino acid changes within domain VI of L protein. Recombinant VSV was recovered from cDNA by transfection of BHK-21 cells infected with a recombinant vaccinia virus (vTF7-3) that expressed T7 RNA polymerase as described (23, 65). Cell culture fluids were collected at 48-96 h post transfection, and recombinant virus was amplified once in BHK-21 cells. Individual plaques were isolated on Vero cells, and seed stocks generated by amplification on BHK-21 cells. Large stocks were then generated by inoculation of 8-10 confluent T150 flask BHK-21 cells at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.01 in a volume of 1 ml DMEM. At 1 h post adsorption, 15 ml of DMEM (supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum) was added to the cultures and infected cells were incubated at 31° C. for 24-72 h. When extensive cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed, cell culture fluids were clarified by centrifugation at 3000×g for 5 min. Virus was concentrated by centrifugation at 40,000×g for 90 min at 4° C. in a Ty 50.2 rotor. The pellet was resuspended in NTE buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris 1 mM EDTA pH 7.4) and further purified through 10% sucrose NTE by centrifugation at 150,000×g for 1 h at 4° C. in an SW50.1 rotor. The final pellet was resuspended in 0.1-0.3 ml volume of NTE buffer. Viral titer was determined by plaque assay on Vero cells, and protein content measured by Bradford reagent (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, Mo.). The L genes of the purified viruses were sequenced again and these stocks used for in vitro transcription reactions.

Single-Cycle Growth Curves

Confluent BHK-21 cells were infected with individual viruses at an MOI of 3. After 1 h adsorption, the inoculum was removed, cells were washed with DMEM, fresh DMEM (supplemented with 2% FBS) was added and infected cells were incubated at 37° C. Aliquots of the cell culture fluid were removed at the indicated intervals and viral titer determined by plaque assay on Vero cells.

Analysis of Protein Synthesis

At the indicated time post infection, cells were washed with methionine⁻ and cysteine⁻ free (M⁻, C⁻) media and incubated with fresh M⁻, C⁻ medium supplemented with actinomycin-D (10 μg/ml). Following a 1 h incubation, the medium was replaced with M⁻, C⁻ free media supplemented with EasyTag [³⁵S]-Express (40 μCi/ml) (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley Mass.). Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE as described previously (65). Labeled proteins were detected either by autoradiography or using a phosphoimager.

Analysis of RNA Synthesis in Cells

At the indicated time post infection, cells were incubated with DMEM containing actinomycin-D (10 μg/ml). Following a 1 h incubation, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing actinomycin-D and [³H]-uridine (30 μCi/ml) (Moravek Biochemicals, Brea, Calif.). At the indicated time post labeling, a cytoplasmic extract was prepared, and RNA was purified following phenol and chloroform extraction essentially as described (44). Purified RNA was analyzed by electrophoresis on acid-agarose gels (36) and detected by fluorography.

Transcription of Viral RNA in Vitro

Viral RNA was synthesized in vitro essentially as described (5) with minor modifications (67). Purified recombinant VSV (10 μg) was activated by incubation with detergent for 5 min at room temperature. RNA synthesis reactions were performed in the presence of NTP's (1 mM ATP, 0.5 mM each of CTP, GTP, UTP). Where indicated, reactions were supplemented with 1 mM SAM or SAH, or 15 μCi of [α-³²P]-GTP (3000 Ci/mmol) or 15 μCi of [³H]-SAM (85 Ci/mmol) (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, Mass.).

Cap Methyltransferase Assay

To examine the extent of cap methylation, purified RNAs were digested with ribonuclease T2 (Invitrogen) and/or tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (TAP) (Epicentre, Madison, Wis.), and the products were analyzed by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on PEI-F cellulose sheets (EM Biosciences). For examination of guanine-N-7 methylation, in vitro transcription reactions were performed in the presence of [α-³²P]-GTP and 1 mM S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) or S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH). For examination of ribose-2′-O methylation, in vitro transcription reactions were performed in the presence of [³H]-SAM. Products of RNA synthesis were purified and approximately one fifth of the reaction was incubated with 2 units of TAP and/or 10 units of RNase T2 according to the manufacturer instructions. Following incubation, one tenth of this reaction was spotted onto a TLC plate, which was developed using 1.2 M LiCl₂. Plates were dried and the spots visualized using a phosphoimager. Markers 7^(m)GpppA and GpppA (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and their TAP digestion products were visualized by UV shadowing at 254 nm.

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative analysis was performed by either densitometric scanning of autoradiographs or using a phosphoimager (GE Healthcare, Typhoon) and ImageQuant TL software (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, N.J.). Statistical analysis was performed on 3-5 separate experiments and the calculated means are shown in each figure along with standard deviation. Significance of the values was determined by a paired Student's t-test.

Results Amino Acid Changes to a Predicted Methyltransferase Domain within the VSV L Protein.

The SAM-dependent MTase superfamily contains a series of conserved motifs (X, I-VIII) (53). By comparing the amino acid sequence of the Escherichia coli heat shock induced methyltransferase RrmJ/FtsJ with conserved domain VI of the L protein of ns NS RNA viruses, it was suggested that this region of L protein might function as a [ribose-2′-O] MTase (9, 22). These alignments indicate that residues G1670, G1672, G1674, G1675, D1735 and residues K1651, D1762, K1795, E1833 of the VSV L protein correspond to a SAM binding motif and catalytic KDKE tetrad respectively (FIGS. 1A & 1B).

As a first step to test this prediction, we engineered the L gene of an infectious cDNA clone of VSV to introduce alanine substitutions at each of the proposed MTase catalytic residues, K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833 as well as to one of the proposed SAM binding residues, G1674. Based on the postulated reaction mechanism of RrmJ (8, 27, 28), and VP39 of vaccinia virus (9, 31) we anticipated that these mutations in the L gene would prevent RNA methylation. Mutational analysis of RrmJ had indicated that the aligned position equivalent to E1833 played only a minor role in RNA methylation (8, 27, 28). Consequently, we chose to include a second substitution at this position E1833Q, in which the size of the residue was maintained.

Recovery of Recombinant Viruses with L Gene Mutations

Each of the L gene mutations yielded viable recombinant virus; however, many of these viruses had clear defects in growth (FIGS. 2A & 2B). Following 24 h of incubation, virus G1674A which contained an alteration in the predicted SAM binding domain formed plaques that were 4.1±0.8 mm in diameter, and this was indistinguishable to the plaque morphology of rVSV (4.0±0.5 mm). By contrast, alterations to the proposed active site residues K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833 resulted in clear defects in plaque formation, as each of the viruses formed only pinpoint plaques. Following 48 h of incubation, the average plaque diameter was 09±0.2 mm for K1651A, 1.1±0.2 mm for D1762A, 0.7±0.1 mm for K1795A, 0.8±0.2 mm for E1833A, 1.2±0.2 mm for E1833Q* and 1.3±0.2 mm for E1833Q (FIGS. 2A & 2B). These data indicate that the proposed MTase active site residues are required for efficient viral replication.

The entire L gene of each recombinant virus was amplified by RT-PCR and sequence analysis confirmed the presence of the desired mutation (FIG. 2A, FIG. 2B, and data not shown). Viruses G1674A, D1762A, K1795A and E1833A contained no additional nucleotide changes within the L gene. Virus K1651A contained an additional change in the complete VSV genome sequence, A5539G, which was non-coding. By contrast, virus E1833Q contained four additional nucleotide changes: G10699A, U10720C, A10739G and U10850C, of which A10739G resulted in a coding change 12002V. Consequently we renamed E1833Q to E1833Q* to reflect these sequence changes, and isolated a fresh E1833Q from an independent transfection (FIGS. 2A & 2B). Sequence analysis of this second isolate of E1833Q confirmed that no additional changes were present within the L gene. The sequence differences in E1833Q* were detected following completion of the experiments shown in FIGS. 3, 7 and 8. However, E1833Q behaved indistinguishably to E1833Q* in its ability to replicate in BHK-21 cells as judged by end point titers, and in its ability to plaque on Vero cells (FIGS. 2A & 2B).

To examine the effect of these L gene mutations on viral growth more specifically, we monitored the kinetics of release of infectious virus by single step growth assay. Briefly, BHK-21 cells were infected with each of the indicated recombinants at an MOI of 3, and viral replication assessed at time points from 0-48 h post-infection as described in methods. The experiment was performed three independent times and the average titer at each time point plotted to generate the graph shown (FIG. 3). Recombinant G1674A replicated with almost indistinguishable kinetics to rVSV. At 24 h post infection viral titer was 9.6±0.6 and 9.7±0.3 log₁₀ pfu ml⁻¹ for G1674A and rVSV respectively. By contrast, viruses D 1762A, E1833Q and E1833Q*, showed a delay in replication and reached titers of 8.1±0.1, 7.9±0.2 and 7.8±0.2 log₁₀ pfu ml⁻¹ respectively at 24 h post infection. Recombinants K1651A, K1795A and E1833A showed the most significant defect in replication, reaching titers of 6.2±0.2, 6.3±0.2 and 6.0±0.1 log₁₀ pfu ml⁻¹ respectively at 24 h post infection. These data show that changes to the predicted MTase active-site residues compromised virus replication resulting in a 10-1000 fold reduction in viral titer at 24 h post-infection, whereas alteration of the predicted SAM binding residue had no detectable effect. These findings correlate well with the plaque diameter for each of the recombinant viruses (FIGS. 2A & 2B).

Effect of L Gene Mutations on mRNA Cap Methylation

To directly examine whether the alterations in domain VI of L protein affected mRNA cap methylation, transcription reactions were performed in vitro. Briefly, 10 μg of virus was activated with detergent and incubated with NTP's supplemented with [α-³²P]-GTP as described. Total RNA was extracted, purified and analyzed by acid-agarose gel electrophoresis as described (FIG. 4). With the exception of K1795A and E1833A, levels of mRNA synthesis were similar for each virus. Quantitative analysis showed that K1795A and E1833A synthesized approximately 40% and 60% of the levels of rVSV mRNA. To compensate for these defects in mRNA synthesis, in subsequent experiments the amount of virus used in the in vitro transcription reactions was increased 2.5 fold.

Tobacco acid pyrophosphatase (TAP) specifically cleaves the pyrophosphate bond of the GpppN cap but does not degrade the mRNA (57). Consequently, cleavage of VSV mRNA's with TAP should yield Gp, or if the cap-structure is methylated, 7^(m)Gp. To examine the extent of [guanine-N-7] methylation of viral mRNA, in vitro transcription reactions were performed in the presence of [α-³²P] GTP. RNA was extracted, purified and incubated with TAP, and the products of cleavage resolved by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on PEI-F cellulose as described in methods. For rVSV when transcription reactions were performed in the presence of S-adenosyl homocysteine (SAH), the by product formed upon methyl group transfer from SAM during cap methylation, a single product of TAP cleavage was detected (FIG. 5A, lane 1). This comigrated with the Gp marker and not the 7^(m)Gp marker generated by TAP cleavage of GpppA and 7^(m)GpppA, indicating that for rVSV the cap structure was not methylated in the presence of SAH. By contrast, TAP cleavage of rVSV mRNA synthesized in the presence of SAM yielded a major product that comigrated with the 7^(m)Gp marker (FIG. 5A, lane 2).

Quantitative analysis of three independent experiments showed that 7^(m)Gp accounted for 96% of the released cap structure for G1674A (FIG. 5A, lane 4) and this was essentially indistinguishable to the observed 97% for rVSV, suggesting that this predicted SAM binding residue was not critical for [guanine-N-7] methyltransferase activity. By contrast, TAP digestion of the RNA's synthesized by E1833A showed that approximately 11% of the released cap was of the form 7^(m)Gp (FIG. 5A, lane 7). Viruses K1651A, D1762A, K1795A, E1833Q and E1833Q* showed essentially no cap methylation, with TAP digestion yielding>99% Gp (FIG. 5A). These data clearly demonstrate that each of the alterations to the proposed MTase active site residues diminished [guanine-N-7] methylation below the limits of detection of our assay.

Ribonuclease T2 is an endoribonuclease which exhibits a preference for cleavage of phosphodiester bonds on the 3′ side of A residues. Consequently complete digestion of the VSV mRNA cap structure 7^(m)GpppA^(m)pApCpApGp with RNAse T2 should yield 7^(m)GpppA^(m) if the cap structure was both [guanine-N-7] and [ribose-2′-O] methylated. TAP digestion of this product would yield 7^(m)G and A^(m). To examine whether the mutations in the L gene affected [ribose-2′-O] and/or [guanine-N-7] methylation, transcription reactions were performed in vitro in the presence of [3H]-SAM as methyl donor as described in methods. RNA was extracted, purified and incubated with TAP and/or RNase T2, and the products of cleavage resolved by TLC on PEI-F cellulose as described. For rVSV when transcription reactions were performed in the presence of [³H]-SAM a single major product of RNase T2 cleavage was detected (FIG. 6A, lane 2) and this product was not observed when reactions were supplemented with SAH (FIG. 6A, lane 1). Digestion with TAP and RNAse T2, resolved this product into two species, 7^(m)Gp and A^(m) (FIG. 6A, lane 10), which were absent when transcription reactions were performed in the presence of SAH demonstrating that they were methylated (FIG. 6A, lane 9).

Quantitative analysis demonstrated that alteration of the predicted SAM binding residue G1674A did not affect the abundance of either the 7^(m)G or A^(m), suggesting that this predicted SAM binding residue was not critical for either [guanine-N-7] or [ribose-2′-O] methylation (FIG. 6A, lanes 4 and 12). By contrast alterations to the predicted catalytic residues K1651A, D1762A, K1795A and E1833Q* reduced both [guanine-N-7] and [ribose-2′-O] methylation to the limit of detection of our assay (FIG. 6A, lanes 11, 13, 14 and 16). Recombinant E1833A showed approximately 5% of the activity of rVSV (FIG. 6A, lane 15). These data clearly demonstrate that alterations to the predicted [ribose-2′-O] MTase domain affected both [guanine-N-7] and [ribose 2′-O] methylation. These data are thus consistent with domain VI of L protein functioning as an mRNA cap methyltransferase, and show that the predicted active-site residues are critical for mRNA cap methylation.

Effect of L Gene Mutations on Viral RNA and Protein Synthesis in Infected Cells

The above experiments demonstrated that recombinant viruses that contained alterations to the predicted MTase active site residues were defective in methylation and that these defects correlated with diminished replication in cell culture. We anticipated that these alterations would affect translation of viral mRNAs, which would lead to a decrease in RNA replication thus generating fewer templates for mRNA transcription. To test this we examined RNA and protein synthesis in infected cells.

Viral RNA synthesis was examined in infected cells at the indicated time post infection. Briefly, BHK-21 cells were infected with each of the indicated recombinants at an MOI of 3, and RNA was metabolically labeled by incorporation of [³H]-uridine for 3 h in the presence of actinomycin-D. Total cytoplasmic RNA was then purified and analyzed by electrophoresis on acid-agarose gels (FIG. 7A). Quantitative analysis (FIG. 7B) of five independent experiments showed that the single amino acid change to the predicted SAM binding residue G1674A had no detectable effect on levels of the viral RNAs (compare FIG. 7A, lanes 1 and 3). By contrast, individual changes to each of the proposed catalytic residues K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833 affected viral RNA levels (compare FIG. 7A, lanes 1, 2, 4-10). For D1762A and E1833A, the observed levels of the N, P/M, G and L mRNAs and the genomic replication products (FIG. 7A, band V), were approximately 40-50% of those for rVSV (FIG. 7B). Similar defects were observed for each of these recombinants when RNA synthesis was examined from 6-9 h pi (data not shown). For E1833Q*, a similar reduction in mRNA synthesis was observed, but the reduction in genome replication was less dramatic in that approximately 75% of the levels of rVSV replication were observed (FIG. 7B). A more pronounced defect was observed for K1795A, where levels of mRNA and genomic replication products were <10% of those for rVSV (FIG. 7A, lane 8). At later times post infection (FIG. 7A, lanes 5, 9 and 10) the levels of K1795A RNAs were still <40% of those observed for rVSV at 3-6 h pi. Whether these reductions reflect a specific defect in mRNA synthesis that results in a reduction in replication, or a general defect in all RNA synthesis could not be distinguished by this assay. Recombinant K1651A exhibited a unique phenotype in that the relative abundance of each of the mRNAs differed compared to rVSV (FIG. 7A, lane 2). Specifically, the L mRNA was 120%, G and N mRNA's were 80% and the P/M mRNAs were 60% of the rVSV levels (FIG. 7B). Statistical analysis of these data using a paired Student's t-test demonstrated that the modest difference in the measured values for G, N and P/M were indeed significant (P<0.05). Whether these differences in the relative mRNA abundance reflect an affect of the K1651A alteration on transcriptional attenuation or the differential stability of the shorter mRNA's could not be determined by this assay. However despite this perturbation in relative mRNA levels the genomic replication products were present in approximately equivalent amounts to rVSV (FIG. 7A, compare product V lanes 1 and 2). These data demonstrate that changes to the predicted SAM binding residue G1674 had no detectable effect on RNA synthesis, whereas alterations to the predicted MTase active site residues resulted in a defect in viral RNA synthesis. These defects however varied from relatively modest for K1651A where levels of P and M mRNA were reduced to 60%, to K1795A which decreased all RNA levels to <10% of those of rVSV.

To examine the effects of these L gene mutations on viral protein synthesis, cells were infected with each of the recombinant viruses and protein synthesis was examined by metabolic labeling as described. Briefly, BHK-21 cells were infected at an MOI of 3, and at the indicated time post infection, cells were incubated with [³⁵S]-met-cys for 3 h. Following incubation, cytoplasmic extracts were prepared and total protein analyzed by SDS-PAGE (FIG. 8A). Quantitative analysis (FIG. 8B) of the levels of viral proteins identified three groups of viruses. Group I were those viruses that were similar to wild-type (G1674A and K1651A), a second group (D1762A, E1833A, E1833Q*) that showed a specific reduction in L protein to approximately 40%, and G protein to approximately 70% of wild-type levels, and virus K1795A which showed a significant delay in protein synthesis and a specific reduction in L and G protein levels. For each of the viruses the levels of the L protein correlated well with the observed levels of L mRNA (compare FIGS. 7B and 8B). By contrast, levels of N, P and M protein levels observed for K1651A, D1762A, E1833A and E1833Q* were approximately equivalent to those of rVSV, despite the observed reductions in the corresponding mRNA levels (FIG. 7B). These data show that the mutations to the predicted MTase domain of VSV L affected viral protein levels in infected cells. However, the RNA synthesis data (FIG. 7B) demonstrate that the major affect of these mutations was on levels of the viral mRNA.

Discussion

We performed a genetic and biochemical analysis of the VSV polymerase to determine if domain VI of L protein functions as a methyltransferase. We generated 6 site directed mutations in the L gene and determined the effect of these changes on viral growth and gene expression. Individual amino acid changes to the proposed MTase catalytic residues decreased levels of viral replication, and resulted in defects in mRNA cap methylation in vitro. By contrast, alteration of a predicted SAM binding residue was individually not sufficient to affect viral replication, or cap methylation. These findings identify a function for domain VI of the VSV L protein in mRNA cap methylation, they map amino acid residues that are important for this activity. Consequently these findings have implications for the mechanism of mRNA processing in VSV and by extrapolation other ns NS RNA viruses.

Comparison of Domain VI of VSVL to Other Known Methyltransferases

Our interest in domain VI of the VSV L protein stemmed from published sequence alignments and structure predictions which suggested this region might adopt a MTase fold closely resembling that of FtsJ/RrmJ (9, 22) a heat shock methylase responsible for modification of the 2′-OH of U2552 in Escherichia coli 23S rRNA (8). The 1.5 Å crystal structure of RrmJ in complex with SAM identified a SAM binding region and suggested that the active site of RrmJ was formed by a catalytic tetrad of residues K38, D124, K164 and E199 (8). Site-directed mutagenesis of RrmJ is more consistent with a catalytic triad of residues K38, D124, K164, with E199 playing only a minor role in the methyltransfer reaction in vivo (27). These results are remarkably similar to the findings reported here, in which we show that alterations to the VSV L protein at residues K1651, D1762 and K1795 diminished methylation below the limits of detection of our assay whereas a change at E1833 retained partial activity (FIGS. 5A & 6A).

Well-characterized viral mRNA cap MTase's for which structural information exists include vaccinia virus VP39 (31), and the Dengue virus (DEN) non-structural protein 5 (18). The structure of the reovirus core demonstrated that the 7 contains two separate MTase domains, but owing to the difficulty of isolating enzymatically active λ2 protein, these activities have not yet been definitively assigned (10, 47). By extrapolation we suggest that K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833 of VSV L protein are equivalent to K41, D138, K175 and E207 of vaccinia virus VP39, and K61, D146, K181 and E217 of DEN NS5. However, it should be cautioned that RrmJ, VP39 and DEN NS5 function as a [ribose 2′-O]-MTase, whereas in the experiments described here we observed defects in both [guanine-N-7] and [ribose 2′-O] MTase activity.

Does Domain VI Function as a Guanine-N-7 or Ribose-2′-O methlyltransferase?

While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, the experiments described here show that alterations in the proposed MTase active site residues affect both [guanine-N-7] and [ribose 2′-O] methylation. However, sequence analysis that guided our mutagenesis suggested that this domain of L functions as a [ribose-2′-O] MTase (9, 22). How might we account for this apparent discrepancy? One possibility is that domain VI functions as both a [ribose-2′-O] and [guanine-N-7] MTase. We do not favor this explanation, as the chemistry of the two RNA methylation reactions is quite distinct, as shown by studies with vaccinia virus where these reactions are carried out by two separate MTases with different substrate specificities (6, 54). An alternative explanation, that is consistent with our data, is a sequential model for VSV mRNA cap methylation in which the product of one methyltransferase acts as the substrate for the second. We favor the suggestion that [ribose 2′-O] methylation is essential for [guanine-N-7] methylation. Such an order of methylation would contrast with other mRNA cap methylation reactions in which the capping guanylate is methylated first, followed by the 2′ OH of the ribose. This suggestion is consistent with previous pulse-chase experiments in which 2′-O methylated cap structures of VSV mRNA's were chased into fully methylated cap structures at high SAM concentrations in vitro (62). However, subsequent studies reached different conclusions suggesting that in fact the order of the VSV methylation reactions was reversed (39) or was not obligatory (29).

Recent studies with SeV support a role for domain VI of L protein as a [guanine-N-7] MTase (43). In these experiments, a fragment of L protein that included domains V and VI was able to methylate short SeV specific RNA sequences in vitro at the [guanine-N-7] position. While these experiments demonstrated that the C-terminus of the SeV L protein has [guanine-N-7] MTase activity, the role of specific amino acid residues was not examined. In addition, the short RNA's were not 2′-O methylated suggesting that either this “trans-methylation” assay did not recapitulate all facets of mRNA cap methylation or that the 2′-O-MTase activity resides elsewhere within L protein.

Sequence alignments show that domain VI of L protein from Newcastle disease virus (NDV) contains a clearly identifiable SAM binding motif as well as the proposed catalytic K-D-K-E tetrad. However, NDV mRNAs are not 2′-O methylated (13), raising the possibility that these residues are conserved because they are required for [guanine-N-7] MTase activity. Close inspection of this region of all ns NS RNA virus polymerases shows a difference in the proposed SAM binding region for the Filoviridae, as well as for the Rubulavirus and Avulavirus genera of the Paramyxoviridae. Each of these viruses contains the sequence AxGxG rather than GxGxG within motif I of the SAM dependent MTase superfamily (53). It will be of interest to determine the biologic consequences of this difference, and whether this change is responsible for the lack of 2′-O methylation in NDV and possibly other ns NS RNA viruses.

Our finding that amino acid alterations within domain VI affect mRNA cap methylation is reminiscent of studies of host range (hr) mutants of VSV. These viruses were competent for growth in BHK cells or chicken embryo fibroblasts, but were severely restricted for their growth in many human cell lines (42). Biochemical characterization of these viruses demonstrated that hr1 was completely defective for mRNA methylation in vitro and that hr8 was defective for [guanine-N-7] methylation (33). To explain the host range of these viruses it was suggested that permissive cells might contain high levels of a cytoplasmic MTase that could overcome a defect in viral mRNA cap methylation, or that the mutations might increase the Km of the viral MTase for SAM and that permissive cells contained higher intracellular levels of SAM. Recently the sequence of hr1 was determined and shown to contain two amino acid changes within L protein at N₅O₅D and D1671V (25). The defect in mRNA cap methylation correlated with the substitution D1671V which resides within the predicted SAM binding region of domain VI. It will be of interest to determine the role of other residues within this predicted SAM binding region on mRNA methylation and host range.

Viral Gene Expression

In this study, we generated a panel of recombinant viruses with defects in mRNA cap methyltransferase activity in vitro. While these viruses show defects in growth in cell culture, they indicate that the viral methyltransferase is not essential for VSV replication. At the onset of these studies we anticipated that perturbations to cap methylation would likely be accompanied by alterations in viral protein synthesis, viral RNA synthesis and viral titers. Remarkably, when protein synthesis was examined in BHK-21 cells from 3-6 h pi, the levels of most viral proteins were similar to those of rVSV, despite clear defects in viral mRNA synthesis and viral titers observed for several of the recombinants. These findings suggest that the VSV mRNA's are synthesized in excess of their requirements for translation in infected cells, and that a 2-fold reduction in viral mRNA abundance (as observed for D1762A, E1833A and E1833Q) does not result in a similar reduction in viral protein.

In VSV infected cells there is a rapid shut off of host-cell protein synthesis (61, 64). It was suggested that an excess of viral mRNAs out-compete cellular mRNAs for translation (37, 38). However in subsequent experiments, in which VSV DI particles were used to decrease viral mRNA levels 14-fold, host-cell translation was efficiently shut-off suggesting that this earlier hypothesis was incorrect (55). Rather, viral infection appears to modulate components of the translation machinery. Host translation can be restored by supplementing infected cell extracts with partially purified initiation factors eIF-2 or eIF-4F (16). Recent work has shown that the eIF-4F complex is altered in VSV infected cells, in that eIF-4E is dephosphorylated and the 4E binding protein (4E-BP1), is activated (14). Decreasing the available pool of the cap binding complex thus contributes to the shut off of host-cell translation in infected cells. In the experiments described here, we found that L gene mutations that compromise mRNA cap methylation in vitro do not result in a corresponding reduction in protein synthesis in infected cells (FIG. 8). This suggests that the effective recruitment of the translational machinery by a VSV mRNA may not be entirely dependent upon a fully methylated mRNA cap-structure. However, it should be cautioned that while in this study we show clear defects in cap methylation in vitro, we cannot eliminate the possibility that a cellular MTase promiscuously methylates the viral mRNA in infected cells and that this might lead to their more efficient translation. Previous work demonstrated that the VSV mRNA cap structure 7^(m)GpppA^(m)pApC could be found in the form 7^(m)Gpppm⁶A^(m)pA^(m)pC in infected cells (41). These two additional methylation events are absent on in vitro synthesized mRNA and were thought to be mediated by cellular MTase's. The biologic consequence of these methylations is not understood, but it will be of interest to examine the methylation status of the mRNA in infected cells.

Viral mRNA Abundance

Recombinant K1651A displays an unusual phenotype in that the levels of each mRNA differed modestly relative to rVSV: L (120%), G and N (80%) and P/M (60%). One possible explanation for these data are that alteration K1651A affects the process of transcriptional attenuation; however, the relative abundance of each of the mRNA's was not altered when the levels of RNA synthesized in vitro were examined arguing against this explanation (FIGS. 4 and 7). A second possibility is that the viral mRNAs were less stable because they were not properly methylated; however, one would expect to see a similar effect for each of the other viruses with defects in methylation. Previous experiments with VSV demonstrated that in vitro transcription reactions performed in the presence of SAH led to the formation of giant heterogeneous poly A tails (51). It seems possible that perturbing methylation might affect mRNA polyadenylation, and that this could differentially affect the stability of the transcripts in infected cells. Perhaps alteration of K1651 results in a subtle conformational change within L protein such that a domain of L involved in polyadenylation is impacted. In any event, further experiments will be necessary to determine the mechanism by which the relative levels of each of the mRNA's of K1651A are altered. Such studies might also explain why K1651A exhibits a 1000 fold defect in viral growth (FIG. 3), yet has only a modest defect in viral gene expression.

In summary, we have shown that amino acid changes to a predicted MTase motif in domain VI of the VSV L protein disrupt mRNA cap methylation, and affect viral replication. The lack of effective vaccines for many ns NS RNA viruses combined with the emergence of new ns NS RNA viruses underscores the need to develop effective therapeutics against this order of viruses. The methyltransferase activities of these viruses are suggested as attractive targets for the development of antiviral drugs (15). These studies contribute to such an objective by defining a region within the VSV L protein against which such inhibitors might be targeted.

FIG. 1: Amino acid sequence alignments of a region encompassing domain VI of ns NS RNA virus L proteins with the RrmJ heat shock 2′-O-methyltransferase of Escherichia coli. The primary amino acid sequences are shown. The conserved motifs (X, I-VIII) correspond to the SAM-dependent MTase superfamily (53). Residues modified in this study are boxed as follows; catalytic (shaded), SAM binding (unshaded). Predicted or known alpha helical regions are shown by the cylinders and the β-sheet regions by the arrows. STR=structure of RrmJ and predicted structure for the ns NS RNA viruses, EBOM=Ebola virus, BEFV=Bovine Ephemeral Fever Virus, VSIV=VSV (Indiana), RABV=Rabies virus, HRSV=Human RS virus, SEV=Sendai virus, RRMJ=E. coli heat shock methyltransferase. Panel A shows alignment without sequence identifiers for the polypeptides presented. Panel B shows the same alignment with sequence identifiers for the polypeptides presented.

FIG. 2: Recombinant VSV with mutations in the L gene. The plaque morphology of each of the recombinant viruses is shown compared to rVSV. Note that plaques of K1651A, D1762A, K1795A, E1833A, E1833Q* and E1833Q were developed after 48 h of incubation compared to rVSV and G1674A which were developed after 24 h. Differing dilutions of the small plaque viruses were plated to emphasize the plaque morphology. The sequence of the modified region for each mutant virus is shown. Note that the sequence trace shown is negative-sense for K1651A, G1674A, D1762A and K1795A, and positive-sense for E1833A and E1833Q. Panel A shows the illustration without sequence identifiers for the polypeptides and polynucleotides presented. Panel B shows the same illustration with sequence identifiers for the polypeptides and polynucleotides presented.

FIG. 3: Single-step growth assay of recombinant VSV in BHK-21 cells. Confluent BHK-21 cells were infected with individual viruses at an MOI of 3. Following a 1 h adsorption, the inoculum was removed, cells were washed with DMEM and fresh medium (containing 2% FBS) was added, and incubated at 37° C. Samples of supernatant were harvested at the indicated intervals over a 48 h time period, and viral titer was determined by plaque assay on Vero cells. Titers are reported as the mean±standard deviation among three independent single-step growth experiments.

FIG. 4: Transcription of viral mRNAs in vitro. (A) Transcription reactions were performed in vitro in the presence of [α-³²P]-GTP, the RNA was purified and analyzed by electrophoresis on acid-agarose gels as described in methods. The products were detected using a phosphoimager. The source of the virus used in the in vitro transcription reactions is indicated above the gel and the identity of the mRNA's is shown on the left. (B) Three independent experiments were used to generate the quantitative analysis shown. For each mRNA the mean±standard deviation was expressed as a percentage of that observed for rVSV.

FIG. 5: Effect of L gene mutations on cap methyltransferase activity. (A) Viral mRNA was synthesized in vitro as described in the presence of either 1 mM SAM or SAH, and 15 μCi of [α-³²P]-GTP. Purified mRNAs were digested with 2 units of tobacco acid pyrophosphatase, and the products analyzed by TLC on PEI cellulose sheets. Plates were dried and the spots visualized by phosphoimager. The identity of the virus is shown at the top of the plate, and the migration of the markers 7^(m)Gp and Gp in the center. (B) Quantitative analysis was performed on five independent experiments. For each virus the released 7^(m)Gp (mean A standard deviation) was expressed as a percentage of the total released cap structure.

FIG. 6: Effect of L gene mutations on [ribose-2′-0] methylation. (A) Viral mRNA was synthesized in vitro as described in the presence of 15 μCi of [3H]-SAM. Purified mRNAs were digested with 10 units of RNAse T2 and/or 2 units of TAP, and the products analyzed by TLC on PEI cellulose sheets. Plates were dried and the spots visualized by phosphoimager. The identity of the virus is shown at the top of the plate, and the migration of the markers 7^(m)Gp and Gp on the right. (B) Quantitative analysis was performed on three independent experiments. For each virus the released 7^(m)G and A^(m) (mean±standard deviation) was expressed as a percentage of that observed for rVSV.

FIG. 7: Effect of L gene mutations on viral RNA synthesis in BHK-21 cells. (A) BHK-21 cells were infected with the wild-type and mutant viruses at MOI of 3. Viral RNAs were labeled with [3H] uridine as described in materials and methods, resolved by electrophoresis on acid-agarose gels and visualized by fluorography. RNA extracted from an equivalent number of cells was loaded in each lane. For K1795A, viral RNA was labeled with [³H] uridine at 3, 6, 9 and 12 h post-infection. The infecting virus is indicated above the lanes along with the time post infection at which the labeling commenced. The identity of the RNA's is shown on the left. V=genomic and antigenomic replication products, L, G, N, P/M=mRNA. (B) Autoradiographs of five independent experiments were scanned and analyzed as described in methods. For each of the resolved RNA products the mean±standard deviation was expressed as a percentage of that observed for rVSV.

FIG. 8: Effect of L gene mutations on viral protein synthesis in BHK-21 cells. (A) BHK-21 cells were infected with the wild-type and mutant viruses at MOI of 3. Proteins were labeled by incorporation of [³⁵S]-met, cys in the presence of Actinomycin D as described in materials and methods. Cytoplasmic extracts were prepared and proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and detected using a phosphorimager. Extract from equivalent numbers of cells was loaded in each lane. For K1795A, viral proteins were labeled either at 3, 6, 9, or 12 h post-infection. The infecting virus is indicated above the lanes along with the time post infection at which the labeling commenced. The identity of the proteins is shown on the left. (B) Three independent experiments were used to generate the quantitative analysis shown. For each protein the mean±standard deviation was expressed as a percentage of that observed for rVSV.

REFERENCES

-   1. Abraham, G., and A. K. Banerjee. 1976. Sequential transcription     of the genes of vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA     73:1504-8. -   2. Abraham, G., D. P. Rhodes, and A. K. Banerjee. 1975. The 5′     terminal structure of the methylated mRNA synthesized in vitro by     vesicular stomatitis virus. Cell 5:51-8. -   3. Ball, L. A. 1977. Transcriptional mapping of vesicular stomatitis     virus in vivo. J Virol 21:411-4. -   4. Ball, L. A., and C. N. White. 1976. Order of transcription of     genes of vesicular stomatitis virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA     73:442-6. -   5. Baltimore, D., A. S. Huang, and M. Stampfer. 1970. Ribonucleic     acid synthesis of vesicular stomatitis virus, II. An RNA polymerase     in the virion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 66:572-6. -   6. Barbosa, E., and B. Moss. 1978.     mRNA(nucleoside-2′-)-methyltransferase from vaccinia virus.     Characteristics and substrate specificity. J Biol Chem 253:7698-702. -   7. Barik, S. 1993. The structure of the 5′ terminal cap of the     respiratory syncytial virus mRNA. J Gen Virol 74 (Pt 3):485-90. -   8. Bugl, H., E. B. Fauman, B. L. Staker, F. Zheng, S. R.     Kushner, M. A. Saper, J. C. Bardwell, and U. Jakob. 2000. RNA     methylation under heat shock control. Mol Cell 6:349-60. -   9. Bujnicki, J. M., and L. Rychlewski. 2002. In silico     identification, structure prediction and phylogenetic analysis of     the 2′-O-ribose (cap 1) methyltransferase domain in the large     structural protein of ssRNA negative-strand viruses. Protein Eng     15:101-8. -   10. Bujnicki, J. M., and L. Rychlewski. 2001. Reassignment of     specificities of two cap methyltransferase domains in the reovirus     lambda 2 protein. Genome Biol 2:RESEARCH0038. -   11. Chandrika, R., S. M. Horikami, S. Smallwood, and S. A.     Moyer. 1995. Mutations in conserved domain I of the Sendai virus L     polymerase protein uncouple transcription and replication. Virology     213:352-63. -   12. Chuang, J. L., and J. Perrault. 1997. Initiation of vesicular     stomatitis virus mutant polR1 transcription internally at the N gene     in vitro. J Virol 71:1466-75. -   13. Colonno, R. J., and H. O, Stone. 1976. Newcastle disease virus     mRNA lacks 2′-O-methylated nucleotides. Nature 261:611-4. -   14. Connor, J. H., and D. S. Lyles. 2002. Vesicular Stomatitis Virus     Infection Alters the eIF4F Translation Initiation Complex and Causes     Dephosphorylation of the eIF4E Binding Protein 4E-BP1. J Virol     76:10177-87. -   15. De Clercq, E. 2004. Antivirals and antiviral strategies. Nat Rev     Microbiol 2:704-20, -   16. Dratewka-Kos, E., I. Kiss, J. Lucas-Lenard, H. B. Mehta, C. L.     Woodley, and A. J. Wahba. 1984. Catalytic utilization of eIF-2 and     mRNA binding proteins are limiting in lysates from vesicular     stomatitis virus infected L cells. Biochemistry 23:6184-90. -   17. Duprex, W. P., F. M. Collins, and B. K. Rima. 2002. Modulating     the function of the measles virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase by     insertion of green fluorescent protein into the open reading frame.     J Virol 76:7322-8. -   18. Egloff, M. P., D. Benarroch, B. Selisko, J. L. Romette, and B.     Canard. 2002. An RNA cap (nucleoside-2′-O—)-methyltransferase in the     flavivirus RNA polymerase NS5: crystal structure and functional     characterization. Embo J 21:2757-68. -   19. Emerson, S. U., and R. R. Wagner. 1972. Dissociation and     reconstitution of the transcriptase and template activities of     vesicular stomatitis B and T virions. J Virol 10:297-309. -   20. Feller, J. A., S. Smallwood, S. M. Horikami, and S. A.     Moyer. 2000. Mutations in conserved domains IV and VI of the     large (L) subunit of the sendai virus RNA polymerase give a spectrum     of defective RNA synthesis phenotypes. Virology 269:426-39. -   21. Feller, J. A., S. Smallwood, M. H. Skiadopoulos, B. R. Murphy,     and S. A. Moyer. 2000. Comparison of identical temperature-sensitive     mutations in the L polymerase proteins of sendai and parainfluenza3     viruses. Virology 276:190-201. -   22. Ferron, F., S. Longhi, B. Henrissat, and B. Canard. 2002. Viral     RNA-polymerases—a predicted 2′-O-ribose methyltransferase domain     shared by all Mononegavirales. Trends Biochem Sci 27:222-4. -   23. Fuerst, T. R., E. G. Niles, F. W. Studier, and B. Moss. 1986.     Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on recombinant vaccinia     virus that synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. Proc Natl     Acad Sci USA 83:8122-6. -   24. Furuichi, Y., and A. J. Shatkin. 2000. Viral and cellular mRNA     capping: past and prospects. Adv Virus Res 55:135-84. -   25. Grdzelishvili, V. Z., S. Smallwood, D. Tower, R. L. Hall, D. M.     Hunt, and S. A. Moyer. 2005. A single amino Acid change in the     L-polymerase protein of vesicular stomatitis virus completely     abolishes viral mRNA cap methylation. J Virol 79:7327-37. -   26. Gupta, K. C., and P. Roy. 1980. Alternate capping mechanisms for     transcription of Spring Viremia of Carp Virus: Evidence for     independent mRNA initiation. J Virol 33:292-303. -   27. Hager, J., B. L. Staker, H. Bugl, and U. Jakob. 2002. Active     site in RrmJ, a heat shock-induced methyltransferase. J Biol Chem     277:41978-86. -   28. Hager, J., B. L. Staker, and U. Jakob. 2004. Substrate binding     analysis of the 23S rRNA methyltransferase RrmJ. J Bacteriol     186:6634-42. -   29. Hammond, D. C., and J. A. Lesnaw. 1987. The fates of     undermethylated mRNA cap structures of vesicular stomatitis virus     (New Jersey) during in vitro transcription. Virology 159:229-36. -   30. Hercyk, N., S. M. Horikami, and S. A. Moyer. 1988. The vesicular     stomatitis virus L protein possesses the mRNA methyltransferase     activities. Virology 163:222-5. -   31. Hodel, A. E., P. D. Gershon, X. Shi, and F. A. Quiocho. 1996.     The 1.85 A structure of vaccinia protein VP39: a bifunctional enzyme     that participates in the modification of both mRNA ends. Cell     85:247-56. -   32. Horikami, S. M., and S. A. Moyer. 1995. Alternative amino acids     at a single site in the Sendai virus L protein produce multiple     defects in RNA synthesis in vitro. Virology 211:577-82. -   33. Horikami, S. M., and S. A. Moyer. 1982. Host range mutants of     vesicular stomatitis virus defective in in vitro RNA methylation.     Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79:7694-8. -   34. Iverson, L. E., and J. K. Rose. 1981. Localized attenuation and     discontinuous synthesis during vesicular stomatitis virus     transcription. Cell 23:477-84. -   35. Keene, J. D., and R. A. Lazzarini. 1976, A comparison of the     extents of methylation of vesicular stomatitis virus messenger RNA.     Virology 69:364-7. -   36. Lehrach, H., D. Diamond, J. M. Wozney, and H. Boedtker. 1977.     RNA molecular weight determinations by gel electrophoresis under     denaturing conditions, a critical reexamination. Biochemistry     16:4743-51. -   37. Lodish, H. F., and M. Porter. 1980. Translational control of     protein synthesis after infection by vesicular stomatitis virus. J     Virol 36:719-33. -   38. Lodish, H. F., and M. Porter. 1981. Vesicular stomatitis virus     mRNA and inhibition of translation of cellular mRNA—is there a P     function in vesicular stomatitis virus? J Virol 38:504-17. -   39. Moyer, S. A. 1981. Alteration of the 5′ terminal caps of the     mRNAs of vesicular stomatitis virus by cycloleucine in vivo.     Virology 112:157-68. -   40. Moyer, S. A., G. Abraham, R. Adler, and A. K. Banerjee. 1975.     Methylated and blocked 5′ termini in vesicular stomatitis virus in     vivo mRNAs. Cell 5:59-67. -   41. Moyer, S. A., and A. K. Banerjee. 1976. In vivo methylation of     vesicular stomatitis virus and its host-cell messenger RNA species.     Virology 70:339-51. -   42. Obijeski, J. F., and R. W. Simpson. 1974. Conditional lethal     mutants of vesicular stomatitis virus. II. Synthesis of     virus-specific polypeptides in nonpermissive cells infected with     “RNA-” host-restricted mutants. Virology 57:369-77. -   43. Ogino, T., M. Kobayashi, M. Iwama, and K. Mizumoto. 2005. Sendai     virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase L protein catalyzes cap     methylation of virus-specific mRNA. J Biol Chem 280:4429-35. -   44. Pattnaik, A. K., and G. W. Wertz. 1990. Replication and     amplification of defective interfering particle RNAs of vesicular     stomatitis virus in cells expressing viral proteins from vectors     containing cloned cDNAs. J Virol 64:2948-57. -   45. Poch, O., B. M. Blumberg, L. Bougueleret, and N. Tordo. 1990.     Sequence comparison of five polymerases (L proteins) of unsegmented     negative-strand RNA viruses: theoretical assignment of functional     domains. J Gen Virol 71 (Pt 5): 1153-62. -   46. Qanungo, K. R., D. Shaji, M. Mathur, and A. K. Banerjee. 2004.     Two RNA polymerase complexes from vesicular stomatitis     virus-infected cells that carry out transcription and replication of     genome RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:5952-7. -   47. Reinisch, K. M., M. L. Nibert, and S. C. Harrison. 2000.     Structure of the reovirus core at 3.6 A resolution. Nature     404:960-7. -   48. Rhodes, D. P., and A. K. Banerjee. 1975. 5′-terminal sequence of     vesicular stomatitis virus mRNA's synthesized in vitro. J Virol     17:33-42. -   49. Rhodes, D. P., S. A. Moyer, and A. K. Banerjee. 1974. In vitro     synthesis of methylated messenger RNA by the virion-associated RNA     polymerase of vesicular stomatitis virus. Cell 3:327-33. -   50. Rose, J. K. 1975. Heterognecous 5′-terminal structures occur on     vesicular stomatitis virus mRNAs. J Biol Chem 250:8098-104. -   51. Rose, J. K., H. F. Lodish, and M. L. Brock. 1977. Giant     heterogeneous polyadenylic acid on vesicular stomatitis virus mRNA     synthesized in vitro in the presence of S-adenosylhomocysteine. J     Virol 21:683-93. -   52. Rose, J. K., and M. A. Whitt. 2001. Rhabdoviridae: The viruses     and their replication, p. 1221-1244. In D. Knipe and P. M. Howley     (ed.), Fields Virology, vol. 1. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. -   53. Schluckebier, G., M. O'Gara, W. Saenger, and X. Cheng. 1995.     Universal catalytic domain structure of AdoMet-dependent     methyltransferases. J Mol Biol 247:16-20. -   54. Schnierle, B. S., P. D. Gershon, and B. Moss. 1992. Cap-specific     mRNA (nucleoside-O2′-)-methyltransferase and poly(A) polymerase     stimulatory activities of vaccinia virus are mediated by a single     protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:2897-901, -   55. Schnitzlein, W. M., M. K. O'Banion, M. K. Poirot, and M. E.     Reichmann. 1983. Effect of intracellular vesicular stomatitis virus     mRNA concentration on the inhibition of host cell protein synthesis.     J Virol 45:206-14. -   56. Schubert, M., G. G. Harmison, C. D. Richardson, and E.     Meier. 1985. Expression of a cDNA encoding a functional     241-kilodalton vesicular stomatitis virus RNA polymerase. Proc Natl     Acad Sci USA 82:7984-8. -   57. Shinshi, H., M. Miwa, and T. Sugimura. 1976. Enzyme cleaving the     5′-terminal methylated blocked structure of messenger RNA. FEBS Lett     65:254-7. -   58. Sleat, D. E., and A. K. Banerjee. 1993. Transcriptional activity     and mutational analysis of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus     RNA polymerase. J Virol 67:1334-9. -   59. Smallwood, S., C. D. Easson, J. A. Feller, S. M. Horikani,     and S. A. Moyer. 1999. Mutations in conserved domain II of the     large (L) subunit of the Sendai virus RNA polymerase abolish RNA     synthesis. Virology 262:375-83. -   60. Smallwood, S., T. Hovel, W. J. Neubert, and S. A. Moyer. 2002.     Different substitutions at conserved amino acids in domains II and     III in the Sendai L RNA polymerase protein inactivate viral RNA     synthesis. Virology 304:135-45. -   61. Stanners, C. P., A. M. Francoeur, and T. Lam. 1977. Analysis of     VSV mutant with attenuated cytopathogenicity: mutation in viral     function, P, for inhibition of protein synthesis. Cell 11:273-81. -   62. Testa, D., and A. K. Banerjee. 1977. Two methyltransferase     activities in the purified virions of vesicular stomatitis virus. J     Virol 24:786-93. -   63. Villarreal, L. P., M. Breindl, and J. J. Holland. 1976.     Determination of molar ratios of vesicular stomatitis virus induced     RNA species in BHK21 cells. Biochemistry 15:1663-7. -   64. Wertz, G. W., and J. S. Youngner. 1972. Inhibition of protein     synthesis in L cells infected with vesicular stomatitis virus. J     Virol 9:85-9. -   65. Whelan, S. P., L. A. Ball, J. N. Barr, and G. T. Wertz. 1995.     Efficient recovery of infectious vesicular stomatitis virus entirely     from cDNA clones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:8388-92. -   66. Whelan, S. P., J. N. Barr, and G. W. Wertz. 2004. Transcription     and replication of nonsegmented negative-strand RNA viruses. Curr     Top Microbiol Immunol 283:61-119. -   67. Whelan, S. P., and G. W. Wertz. 2002. Transcription and     replication initiate at separate sites on the vesicular stomatitis     virus genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9178-83.

While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims. 

1. An attenuated non-segmented negative-sense RNA virus comprising at least one mutation in the L gene wherein the mutation reduces viral replication.
 2. The virus of claim 1 wherein the at least one mutation results in an amino acid modification in Domain VI of the L protein.
 3. The virus of claim 1 wherein the at least one mutation results in a modification to an amino acid residue conserved among at least three non-segmented negative-sense RNA viruses.
 4. The virus of claim 1 wherein at least one mutation results in a modification to an amino acid residue conserved among at least five non-segmented negative-sense RNA viruses.
 5. The virus of claim 1 wherein the at least one mutation results in a modification to the L protein of vesicular stomatitis virus at an amino acid position selected from the group consisting of K1651, G1670, D1671, G1672, S1673, G1675, D1735, D1762, K1795, and E1833 or an amino acid adjacent or proximal thereto.
 6. The virus of claim 5 wherein the amino acid position is selected from the group consisting of K1651, G1670, G1672, G1675, D1735, K1795, and E1833 or a combination thereof.
 7. The virus of claim 5 wherein at least one mutation results in an amino acid substitution.
 8. The virus of claim 5 wherein the virus comprises at least two mutations.
 9. The virus of claim 5 wherein the virus comprises at least three mutations.
 10. The virus of claim 5 wherein the virus comprises at least four mutations.
 11. The virus of claim 1 wherein the at least one mutation alters an amino acid located at the L protein surface as predicted by protein modeling or crystallography.
 12. (canceled)
 13. The virus of claim 5 wherein at least one mutation alters an amino acid adjacent to K1651, G1670, G1675, D1735, D1762, K1795, and E1833.
 14. The virus of claim 5 wherein the mutation results in a deletion of one or more amino acids.
 15. The virus of claim 5 wherein the mutation results in an insertion of one or more amino acids.
 16. The virus of claim 1 wherein mRNA cap methylation activity is reduced.
 17. The virus of claim 1 wherein mRNA cap methylation activity is reduced by at least 50%.
 18. The virus of claim 1 wherein the virus substantially retains its ability to express N, P, M or G protein.
 19. The virus of claim 31 wherein the virus is selected from the group consisting of: Avulavirus; Newcastle disease virus; Henipavirus; Hendravirus; Nipah virus; Morbillivirus; measles; rinderpest; canine distemper; Respiro virus; Sendai; human parainfluenza viruses 1 and 3; bovine parainfluenza virus; Rubulavirus; mumps; simian parainfluenza virus 5; human parainfluenza virus 2; menangle virus; Pneumoviridae; human respiratory syncytial virus; pneumoniavirus; respiratory syncytial virus; Metapneumo virus; pneumovirus; metapneumo virus; Cytorhabdo virus; Lettuce necrotic yellows virus; Ephemerovirus; ephemeral fever virus; Lyssavirus; rabies; mokola; lyssavirus; Novirhabdovirus; infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus; viral hemorrhagic septicemia; Nucleorhabdo virus; sonchus yellow net virus; potato yellow dwarf virus; Vesiculovirus; Vesicular stomatitis Indiana virus; Vesicular stomatitis New Jersey virus; spring viremia; Marburg virus; and Ebola virus.
 20. The virus of claim 1 further comprising a heterologous polynucleotide.
 21. The virus according to claim 20 wherein the heterologous polynucleotide encodes an antigen.
 22. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the virus of claim 1 and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
 23. A method of vaccinating an animal comprising administering the pharmaceutical composition of claim
 22. 24. A method of treating a tumor comprising administering a therapeutically effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition of claim
 22. 25. A method of delivering a polynucleotide to an animal or plant comprising administering the virus of claim
 20. 26. (canceled)
 27. (canceled)
 28. The virus of claim 20 wherein the heterologous polynucleotide is RNA, siRNA or microRNA.
 29. The method of claim 23 wherein the subject is a human.
 30. The virus of claim 1 wherein the virus is of the order of Mononegavirales.
 31. The virus of claim 30 wherein the virus is of a family selected from the group consisting of Rhabdoviridae, Filoviridae and Paramyxoviridae.
 32. The virus of claim 11, wherein the at least one mutation occurs at the surface of the vesicular stomatitis virus L protein at an amino acid position selected from the group consisting of: K1651, D1762, K1795 and E1833. 